I am on a condemning phase. Heard of that one before? probably not. Probably yes. So i condemned hugo boss of late. Why? I read/ researched through sources that were accessible by me that they made clothes for the NAZI's during WW II. Not alone that..they used slaves( all ages) to make those clothes and once the purpose was solved they were sent to the ovens to bake.Sounds crude. This is wat exactly was read. Now its obvious that why alone Hugo Boss then? Why not IBM? Why not BMW? Why not this why not that? Simple reason. I cant condemn everything. I will condemn things i can do without and can afford, well if not rite now..later..oh pls..everyone can afford hugo boss..if not the original then the one we get at chor bazaar. My simple Strategy..every drop makes an ocean. True i wont be able to stop any of these firms to having awesome sales. But thats not my aim. My question is why dint hugo boss own up to it? Why did they keep saying, we need to check manuscripts and be diplomatic? Wat would go so hellfully wrong if they said yes. Business perspective, i think if they had accepted it probably things would be different. Like say people would have appreciated the gesture and their sales probably would have boomed more. I dont know. My thoughts are not as gathered right now. All i know is KNOWINGLY i dont want to be spraying perfume from a bottle that had a bloody history or gifting someone a menswear that is filled with tears, sweat and blood of someone else.(Sweatshops of today?) Its a painful thing to say..or do in my case. If people can be vegetarians cos of the things animals go thru, or support PETA by rallying around naked..im allowed to condemn Hugo Boss for now m i not? Irrational as it mite be, inexplicable as it might be..or just as ridiculous as it can be..thats wat an opinion is:)

take care

P.S I have a lot of loopholes in this blog. I can be condemned for having so many of them!I will cover them up eventually.